News

New Report Explores Latest Best Practices in State Bioscience Economic Development Initiatives

The Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO), in partnership with the Council of State Bioscience Associations (CSBA), released a new report on the best practices in state bioscience economic development measures, “The U.S. Biosciences Industry in the States: Best Practices in Innovation, Partnerships, and Job Creation.”

The report, now in its seventh edition, analyzes the latest legislative and regulatory economic development initiatives at the state and regional level that help support the bioscience sector.

“At every level of government, public policy has a profound impact on the bioscience ecosystem and its ability to innovate and grow,” said Rachel King, President and CEO of BIO. “This report provides an in-depth guide for how state policymakers can help foster a strong bioscience economy, fuel job creation, and drive an innovative economy in their state.”

The report reviews public policy initiatives in all 50 states and spotlights noteworthy programs that enhance the future of the bioscience industry. In addition to several specific state policy examples, the report identified four national trends that helped retain and grow the bioscience sector at the state level in 2023:

  • Building career pathways for future biosciences talent is crucial.
  • States and regions are addressing their regulatory climate to ensure predictable and stable regulatory treatment of biosciences firms.
  • Utilization of innovative technology-based economic development tax support strategies is on the rise.
  • Universities and research centers continue to be strong partners in pre-commercialization research and technology transfer.

“BIO and CSBA’s new report serves as a roadmap for economic development in the biosciences industry, showcasing proven strategies and innovative practices implemented by states across the US,” said John Conrad, Board Vice Chair of CSBA and President and CEO of Illinois Biotechnology Innovation Organization (iBIO). “Illinois, in particular, has made significant strides in implementing economic incentives to drive growth in the state’s bioscience sector, generating high-quality jobs, and fostering an entrepreneurial ecosystem that remains essential to the industry’s future success.”

“This report confirms the vital role U.S. biosciences companies have in creating jobs and stimulating the economy, and illustrates the continuation of the increasingly-supportive role that state and regional policymakers are playing in company retention and expansion in their locations,” said Pete Pellerito, BIO Senior Policy Adviser and principal author of the report.

The full report is available at bio.org/bestpractices.

 

Recent News

08/26/2025

Activation Capital Names Michael Steele as President and CEO

The Virginia Biotechnology Research Partnership Authority (doing business as Activation Capital) announced today that it has appointed Michael Steele as president and chief executive officer. Steele succeeds Robert Ward, who has served as interim CEO since July 2024 during a period of rapid growth for the life sciences ecosystem development organization. Steele comes to Activation

08/25/2025

Danforth Advisors Acquires PharmaDirections

Danforth Advisors LLC, today announced the acquisition of PharmaDirections, Inc., a full-spectrum development partner to life science companies, expanding its integrated capabilities from discovery through commercialization. Founded in 2003, PharmaDirections was a pioneer of the virtual drug development model. The company brings veteran program leaders and more than 150 specialists to support strategic planning and

08/22/2025

ivWatch Technology Linked to Major Reduction in Severe IV Injuries in Newborns Over Four-Year Study

A study published this month in The BMJ (British Medical Journal) analyzed the use of optical sensor technology from ivWatch, the U.S.-based IV safety company, in the early detection of peripheral intravenous infiltration or extravasation (PIVIE) events in neonates. Presenting a comparative evaluation between conventional observational methods and continuous sensor-based monitoring, the study offers insights